A Perry Township elementary school, Glenn’s Valley, has
succeeded in drawing my ire for their gross lack of common sense, and their
ignorance of history and lack of courage to defend it. Traditionally, students and parents at this
elementary school have had classroom parties to celebrate Christmas,
Valentine’s Day, Thanksgiving, and Halloween; but that is about to change. I am not certain if a parent and/or child was
“offended” by the mere mention of these holidays, or an over-zealous
administrator decided these holiday names were just too offensive. Regardless of the motivation, the party names
have officially changed.
On September 28th, 2012 Glenn’s Valley sent a school
bulletin home to parents to explain the schools updated “Holiday Party
Policy.” On October 26th parents
and students will have great fun as they celebrate Halloween and Thanksgiving
with their “Harvest Party.” On December 20th students can
enjoy carrots and celery as they joyfully celebrate Christmas with their annual
“Holiday Party.” And on February 14th Glenn’s
Valley School students will forgo a Valentine’s Day celebration so they can revel
at their “Friendship Party.”
Christmas, the recognition of Jesus Christ’s birth, was
designated a federal/national holiday in 1870 by Congress and President Ulysses
S. Grant. Thanksgiving, a holiday established
to give thanks to Almighty God for His provisions, has been a federal/national
holiday since our nation’s inception and was eventually fixed on the 4th
day of November by President Roosevelt. Sooo….Why
can’t a government school in central Indiana celebrate holidays that are
recognized by the U.S. Federal Government?
The truth is that schools, public and private, can and
should celebrate these holidays. Political
correctness and the fear of law suits seem to have pushed many ignorant and spineless
school administrators to water down our nation’s history and thus our holidays. The only thing Glenn’s Valley Elementary
School succeeded in doing is to further offend the Christian majority and those
parents with common sense. I am not
ignorant of the fact that its apparently okay to offend Christians as long as
it’s done under the guise of “inclusiveness.”
Many of our public schools have no problem showing movies in
classrooms that depict adultery, violence, language, and immoral behavior and
deem it “educational.” My wife and I personally
experienced this and were forced to exclude one of my children from a class because
the teacher decided to show the very movie I described; despite our objections
and concerns. It is okay for our schools
to offend the Christian values of my family by showing inappropriate movies,
but it is not okay for schools to celebrate Christmas, a holiday that
celebrates the birth of a man who called us to “turn the other cheek”, “forgive”
and “do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” If I had to be forced to remove my child from
a classroom over an inappropriate movie, why can’t the Muslim, Hindu, Atheist
or Jewish families choose to exclude their child from a classroom throwing a Christmas
party? The Christian is always the one
sacrificed. Our public education system
is upside down, broken beyond repair, and should be dismantled. (Stay tuned for a future article on the
Purpose of Education)
In a similar act of stupidity, this same newsletter/bulletin
stated, “Students may not bring cans of
soda pop or candy to eat at lunch…juice boxes are acceptable….Students are
expected to eat lunch each day unless parents send a note to the contrary….We cannot allow food from Taco Bell,
Hardees, Wendy’s, McDonalds, Pizza Hut, Subway, etc. to be brought to school at
lunchtime by parents for their child. This activity causes too many distractions as
well as hurt feelings among students.”
So I can starve my child as long as I send a note, but I can’t send a
few Skittles as a dessert in their lunch!?
I am contemplating whether or not I will send my child to school with a
2-liter of Mountain Dew and a bag of M & M’s with a note stating, “MY
CHILD has MY permission to eat this junk food just to offend whoever
made this stupid rule.” Simply stated, I
am responsible for my child’s nutrition…NOT the government schools; and I will
decide what they eat; and I’m not concerned about whether or not little Johnnie
has a jealous fit because he didn’t get McDonalds for lunch. Coveting your neighbor’s possessions is a
lesson most of these kids (and politicians) need to be taught anyway.
Indiana has become a sad place indeed.
ReplyDeleteIt's time for the people of Perry Twp to remind their School Board just who is the boss! Those School Board memebers work for the people, as does their appointed Superintendent! Accountability is the answer. Vote them out.
ReplyDeleteDirectly lying to parents (their employers) cannot stand! The false statement: "We cannot allow food from Taco Bell, Hardees, Wendy’s, McDonalds, Pizza Hut, Subway, etc. to be brought to school at lunchtime by parents for their child" is a false statement! There is no reason the school cannot allow parents to choose the meal their respective child has.
-As for the outrageous comment: "This activity causes too many distractions as well as hurt feelings among students” perhaps it's time for Perry Schools to be ORDERED to teach a few basics: that life is tough, it's even tougher if you're stupid, life is not fair and just, and that the world doesn't care if you have hurt feelings!
So some students receiving free or reduced lunches doesn't hurt anybody's feelings? Heck, if they cited some obscure health code regulation that would have made more sense than simply saying it hurts feelings. So how do they dish out grades on papers? Does everybody get a B-?
ReplyDeleteI can't wait to get my wife a "Friendship Day" card. That'll go over like a lead balloon. Absent the snarkiness, I'm speechless.